It is well known that when a Mento is dropped into soda, something cool happens. But, what actually happens?
The dissolved CO2 in the soda is constantly looking for a place to accumulate and form a bubble. But, bubbles donít form spontaneously because the water molecules keep the CO2 molecules trapped in its weak structure (connected by hydrogen bonds).
When a Mento is dropped into the soda, the CO2 molecules gather in small craters on the Mento, which can also be called nucleation sites. When enough CO2 molecules gather in a nucleation site, a bubble forms and is lifted up. Using the balloon, these bubbles can be captured, and the amount of CO2 can be measured.
The following experiment was created to show the effect of the amount of Mentos (hence, more surface area and nucleation sites) on the volume of CO2 released by the soda.
Step 1: Defining the Problem for Investigation
Question: How does the number of Mentos affect the amount/rate of CO2 being released from soda?
The independent variable in this experiment is the number of Mentos put into a soda can.
The dependent variable is the amount of CO2 released from the soda and the rate at which it is released, as measured by the width of the balloon containing the CO2.
Hypothesis: If a certain amount of Mentos are dropped into a container of soda, then the container with the most Mentos dropped into it will produce the most CO2 at the fastest rate. This will happen because the dissolved CO2 will provide the most nucleation sites to come out of the solution.
Step 2: Materials
This experiment should be conducted somewhere where the ground and wall coincide (this allows the metric tape measure to be taped to the wall), and where the temperature is fairly constant.
Step 3: Procedure
A video of steps 9-13 can be found above.
Step 4: Data
The Effect of the Number of Mentos on the Amount of CO2 Produced
Trial 1Trial 2Trial 3Average 1 Mento8.0cm6.0cm5.5cm6.5cm* 2 Mentos7.5cm9.0cm9.5cm8.7cm*3 Mentos9.5cm8.0cm9.5cm9.0cm*
*Note: Averages are in tenths because the data collected is only accurate up to one decimal point
Figure 4.1: Data of biggest width per trial
Figure 4.2: Average of all the trials to show the difference in rate
Figure 4.3: Data table for figuring out rate
Video: All of the trials at the same time
Next two pictures/GIFs: examples from the experiment
Step 5: Conclusion/Validity
It was hypothesized that if a certain amount of Mentos are dropped into a container of soda, then the container with the most Mentos dropped into it will produce the most CO2 at the fastest rate. This hypothesis was supported because 3 Mentos inflated the balloon an average of 9 cm at a rate of .212 cm/sec. This can be compared to 2 Mentos, which only inflated the balloon an average of 8.7 cm at a rate of .202 cm/sec, or 1 Mento, with the balloon inflating an average of 6.5 cm at a rate of .111 cm/sec. It was observed that the difference in rate and width of the balloon was drastically larger between 2 and 3 Mentos than 1 and 2 (as shown in Figure 4.2). This suggests that the amount of dissolved CO2 in the soda is close to being completely used up.
Repeatability: This experiment can be repeated easily due to the understandable procedure, demonstrations, the definition of controlled variables, and a list of materials with amounts included.
Precision: The data of this experiment is reasonably precise. The data clearly showed a trend, but was still fairly scattered (see Reliability for explanation).
Accuracy: The data collected in this experiment canít be compared to a true value because there is not one for this experiment. But, the trend of the data is supported by other studies of the same subject (See sources for more information).
Reliability: The data is reliable because it is supported by other experiments, the constants were kept, and the procedure was followed closely. A human error in this experiment that lowered the reliability was that the balloon did not make an airtight seal with the bottle (see trial 3 with 1 Mento in the video). This can be solved by using a tighter rubber band or by using two rubber bands (see trial 3 of 3 Mentos). Two additional constant variables that should have been kept are the time waited before recording the data, and the type of balloon used. These would both increase the reliability of the data by raising the precision of the data.
Step 6: Further Studies and SourcesFurther Studies/Ideas
Alternate Independent variables:
College physics class' version of this experiment: http://tinyurl.com/sodaAndMentos
These sources are helpful, but the best way to figure anything out is by experiMENTOtion.
Please VOTE for this instructable if you liked it! Also, this instructable was designed by a 15-year-old, but can be replicated by anyone!